- use succincter method names that more closely resemble dictionary
and HashTable method names. This improves method name consistency
between classes and also requires less typing effort:
args.found(optName) vs. args.optionFound(optName)
args.readIfPresent(..) vs. args.optionReadIfPresent(..)
...
args.opt<scalar>(optName) vs. args.optionRead<scalar>(optName)
args.read<scalar>(index) vs. args.argRead<scalar>(index)
- the older method names forms have been retained for code compatibility,
but are now deprecated
- inherit from std::iterator to obtain the full STL typedefs, meaning
that std::distance works and the following is now possible:
labelRange range(100, 1500);
scalarList list(range.begin(), range.end());
--
Note that this does not work (mismatched data-types):
scalarList list = identity(12345);
But this does, since the *iter promotes label to scalar:
labelList ident = identity(12345);
scalarList list(ident.begin(), ident.end());
It is however more than slightly wasteful to create a labelList
just for initializing a scalarList. An alternative could be a
a labelRange for the same purpose.
labelRange ident = labelRange::identity(12345);
scalarList list(ident.begin(), ident.end());
Or this
scalarList list
(
labelRange::null.begin(),
labelRange::identity(12345).end()
);
- some functionality similar to what the standary library <iterator>
provides.
* stdFoam::begin() and stdFoam::end() do type deduction,
which means that many cases it is possible to manage these types
of changes.
For example, when managing a number of indices:
Map<labelHashSet> lookup;
1) Longhand:
for
(
Map<labelHashSet>::const_iterator iter = lookup.begin();
iter != lookup.end();
++iter
)
{ .... }
1b) The same, but wrapped via a macro:
forAllConstIter(Map<labelHashSet>, lookup, iter)
{ .... }
2) Using stdFoam begin/end templates directly
for
(
auto iter = stdFoam::begin(lookup);
iter != stdFoam::end(lookup);
++iter
)
{ .... }
2b) The same, but wrapped via a macro:
forAllConstIters(lookup, iter)
{ .... }
Note that in many cases it is possible to simply use a range-based for.
Eg,
labelList myList;
for (auto val : myList)
{ ... }
for (const auto& val : myList)
{ ... }
These however will not work with any of the OpenFOAM hash-tables,
since the standard C++ concept of an iterator would return a key,value
pair when deferencing the *iter.
The deduction methods also exhibits some slightly odd behaviour with
some PtrLists (needs some more investigation).
