Vastly reduces the scattering and churning behaviour of packed beds.
Development provided by Will Bainbridge <github.com/will-bainbridge>
See also http://www.openfoam.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=1994
RunFunctions: Added "isTest()" argument parsing function
tutorials: Updated Allrun scripts to propagate the "-test" option
tutorials: Removed the lower Alltest scripts and updated the Allrun to
use the "isTest()" function to handle test-specific operation
The boundary conditions of HbyA are now constrained by the new "constrainHbyA"
function which applies the velocity boundary values for patches for which the
velocity cannot be modified by assignment and pressure extrapolation is
not specified via the new
"fixedFluxExtrapolatedPressureFvPatchScalarField".
The new function "constrainPressure" sets the pressure gradient
appropriately for "fixedFluxPressureFvPatchScalarField" and
"fixedFluxExtrapolatedPressureFvPatchScalarField" boundary conditions to
ensure the evaluated flux corresponds to the known velocity values at
the boundary.
The "fixedFluxPressureFvPatchScalarField" boundary condition operates
exactly as before, ensuring the correct flux at fixed-flux boundaries by
compensating for the body forces (gravity in particular) with the
pressure gradient.
The new "fixedFluxExtrapolatedPressureFvPatchScalarField" boundary
condition may be used for cases with or without body-forces to set the
pressure gradient to compensate not only for the body-force but also the
extrapolated "HbyA" which provides a second-order boundary condition for
pressure. This is useful for a range a problems including impinging
flow, extrapolated inlet conditions with body-forces or for highly
viscous flows, pressure-induced separation etc. To test this boundary
condition at walls in the motorBike tutorial case set
lowerWall
{
type fixedFluxExtrapolatedPressure;
}
motorBikeGroup
{
type fixedFluxExtrapolatedPressure;
}
Currently the new extrapolated pressure boundary condition is supported
for all incompressible and sub-sonic compressible solvers except those
providing implicit and tensorial porosity support. The approach will be
extended to cover these solvers and options in the future.
Note: the extrapolated pressure boundary condition is experimental and
requires further testing to assess the range of applicability,
stability, accuracy etc.
Henry G. Weller
CFD Direct Ltd.
To see the different behavior of flow through and around the blockage
change D in constant/fvOptions:
// D 100; // Very little blockage
// D 200; // Some blockage but steady flow
// D 500; // Slight waviness in the far wake
D 1000; // Fully shedding behavior
When restarting form a previous calculation, the averaging is continuous or
may be restarted using the \c restartOnRestart option.
The averaging process may be restarted after each calculation output time
using the \c restartOnOutput option or restarted periodically using the \c
periodicRestart option and setting \c restartPeriod to the required
averaging period.
Example of function object specification:
\verbatim
fieldAverage1
{
type fieldAverage;
functionObjectLibs ("libfieldFunctionObjects.so");
...
restartOnRestart false;
restartOnOutput false;
periodicRestart false;
restartPeriod 0.002;
fields
(
U
{
mean on;
prime2Mean on;
base time;
window 10.0;
windowName w1;
}
p
{
mean on;
prime2Mean on;
base time;
}
);
}
\endverbatim
\heading Function object usage
\table
Property | Description | Required | Default value
type | type name: fieldAverage | yes |
restartOnRestart | Restart the averaging on restart | no | no
restartOnOutput | Restart the averaging on output | no | no
periodicRestart | Periodically restart the averaging | no | no
restartPeriod | Periodic restart period | conditional |
fields | list of fields and averaging options | yes |
\endtable
in decomposeParDict.
This default number of processors may be overridden by the new "-np"
option to runParallel which must be specified before the application
name e.g.:
runParallel -np 4 pisoFoam
Provides run-time selection of buoyancy sources for compressible solvers
Replaces the built-in buoyancy sources in XiFoam, reactingFoam and
rhoReactingFoam.
e.g. in constant/fvOptions specify
momentumSource
{
type buoyancyForce;
buoyancyForceCoeffs
{
fieldNames (U);
}
}
and optionally specify the buoyancy energy source in the enthalpy
equation:
energySource
{
type buoyancyEnergy;
buoyancyEnergyCoeffs
{
fieldNames (h);
}
}
or internal energy equation
energySource
{
type buoyancyEnergy;
buoyancyEnergyCoeffs
{
fieldNames (e);
}
}
The built-in explicit symplectic integrator has been replaced by a
general framework supporting run-time selectable integrators. Currently
the explicit symplectic, implicit Crank-Nicolson and implicit Newmark
methods are provided, all of which are 2nd-order in time:
Symplectic 2nd-order explicit time-integrator for 6DoF solid-body motion:
Reference:
Dullweber, A., Leimkuhler, B., & McLachlan, R. (1997).
Symplectic splitting methods for rigid body molecular dynamics.
The Journal of chemical physics, 107(15), 5840-5851.
Can only be used for explicit integration of the motion of the body,
i.e. may only be called once per time-step, no outer-correctors may be
applied. For implicit integration with outer-correctors choose either
CrankNicolson or Newmark schemes.
Example specification in dynamicMeshDict:
solver
{
type symplectic;
}
Newmark 2nd-order time-integrator for 6DoF solid-body motion:
Reference:
Newmark, N. M. (1959).
A method of computation for structural dynamics.
Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 85(3), 67-94.
Example specification in dynamicMeshDict:
solver
{
type Newmark;
gamma 0.5; // Velocity integration coefficient
beta 0.25; // Position integration coefficient
}
Crank-Nicolson 2nd-order time-integrator for 6DoF solid-body motion:
The off-centering coefficients for acceleration (velocity integration) and
velocity (position/orientation integration) may be specified but default
values of 0.5 for each are used if they are not specified. With the default
off-centering this scheme is equivalent to the Newmark scheme with default
coefficients.
Example specification in dynamicMeshDict:
solver
{
type CrankNicolson;
aoc 0.5; // Acceleration off-centering coefficient
voc 0.5; // Velocity off-centering coefficient
}
Both the Newmark and Crank-Nicolson are proving more robust and reliable
than the symplectic method for solving complex coupled problems and the
tutorial cases have been updated to utilize this.
In this new framework it would be straight forward to add other methods
should the need arise.
Henry G. Weller
CFD Direct
