Mark Olesen 063d8edea1 PackedBoolList specializaton for operator= ... - now that I re-examined the code, the note in commit 51fd6327a6 can be mostly ignored PackedList isMaster(nPoints, 1u); is not really inefficient at all, since the '1u' is packed into 32/64-bits before the subsequent assignment and doesn't involve shifts/masking for each index The same misinformation applies to the PackedList(size, 0u) form. It isn't much slower at all. Nonetheless, add bool specialization so that it is a simple assign.		2009-12-03 16:33:58 +01:00
..
Make	bugfix PackedList for non-optimized compilation	2009-07-23 22:46:52 +02:00
PackedListTest.C	PackedBoolList specializaton for operator=	2009-12-03 16:33:58 +01:00